Dr. Zach explained in-depth the difference between the innate immune system and the adaptive immune system – and why the innate immune system is all-important when it comes to being healthy and preventing dis-ease. In addition, Dr Zach warns about what’s to come for many who choose to get the new, experimental vaccine.
I believe this information is so important for every individual to know and understand, especially at this critical moment, that I transcribed this interview word-for-word for all who prefer reading over watching the video. I highly recommend watching the video also.
Below is the transcription.
Wishing you health and happiness,
Innate Immune System vs Adaptive Immune System | Zach Bush, MD
The innate immune system is the second-by-second, regulatory system that controls how we use genomic info from the viruses.
The adaptive immune system makes downstream decisions on our relationship, not with the viruses, but with the proteins that we produce from the viruses.
A cell decides it will take in this viral genomics. So, for example, coronavirus is an RNA strand. The virus is delivered through a binding of the capsid of the envelope that sends across the world this viral particle to me. I breathe it in. It binds to my respiratory cells. I absorb that into my blood stream.
Now it dumps that genetic info into my bloodstream and it goes system-wide. My lungs and vascular system can then distribute genetic information throughout my body or keep it expressed in the endothelial of my blood vessels or my lungs.
The innate immune system is making these decisions whether to use this information or not.
Interestingly, RNA ribosomal transcription (which is a complex science word for “decision-making proteins from genetic information”) – RNA ribosomal regulation is now understood to be the most complicated and most highly regulated step in human biology of anything.
At the genetic level, there are over 200 proteins that have to be present to turn ON the transcription factors that will allow a ribosome to take that RNA into a protein – and there’s another 80 proteins that are there to suppress the activity of that ribosome.
You need just the right balance between activators and suppressors of the genetic sequence transcription device before you even decide to make a new virus or viral protein.
This is very important information because the way doctors are taught today and the way consumers are taught, is that viruses suddenly take over the human genetic system and replicate themselves and attack your body.
If that was the case, I would be dead instantaneously right now because I have 10-15 viruses in my bloodstream. I only have a trillion cells at most that are interacting with these viruses. I have more viruses than I have cells interacting with this genetic information.
I would almost instantaneously be taken over if the ribosomal RNA was not the most regulated step in human biology. It had to be for us to occur as a human species. It had to be for the mammals to occur as a genus. Because we needed a regulatory function to keep us in communication with the genomic sequences of the world.
The innate immune system has been keeping mammals in a dance with the greater world around us for millions of years. And we just showed up as homo sapiens 200,000 years ago. So we are new on the scene.
If my body decides it needs to integrate this RNA information into proteins and utilize this genetic information then all the system has to agree and say,
“YES, we’re going to use this new protein structure and we’re going to start using this in large amounts. We need it so much, we’re going to replicate the entire viral capsid and send it out throughout our body. In fact, it’s so important, we want to make sure our loved ones are getting the same genetic information. So we’re going to send out clouds of this in our respiratory secretions and everything else so that we make sure everyone is getting the same genetic update.”
But before I ever get an infection or become productive of this virus, my body had to make hundreds of agreements that said yes, this is not only good for us, it’s good for the world.
So when we see a viral syndrome, the genetic information is important to our biology.
Now, we see death and dying from HIV, so we say, “that virus must be bad”.
It’s not the genetic information there, as we know that asymptomatic HIV presence is rampant.
In a study of 8,700 asymptomatic healthy individuals in the US, Europe and Asia, where we have the lowest amounts of HIV and AIDS in the world, we looked at 8700 people all who had been screened for infectious diseases so that they could donate blood. They screened negative for HIV, HEP C, all these things. We took that group and looked for PCR evidence in that group and 5x greater quantity that influenza, was HIV.
And so, if that maps to the rest of the world, then we missed our estimates on the current HIV load in the population by 470 million people.
We grossly underestimated the amount of HIV in the world because we kept thinking that HIV was a genetic sequence attacking humans. But in fact, it’s not until you find a group of humans who have a poisoned or dis-regulated innate immune system that HIV and all the herpes viruses that have to be present to create AIDS can actually occur.
In other words, HIV doesn’t cause AIDS.
That is like heresy in the science world. But in fact we never had a science experiment in which we tried to infect human or animal with HIV and it caused AIDS. It’s never happened.
HIV is present in people with AIDS and so are eight other herpes viruses and when all this is happening, it’s symptomatic of or demonstrative of “we just lost regulation with the 10-15 viruses that are in the human being”.
So AIDS is a symptom of a collapse of the innate immune system. It is not an over-expression of a single virus. It is impossible that a single virus can cause AIDS because the symptoms of AIDS are actually kaposi sarcoma and a very specific kind of leukemia, both of which come from herpes viruses, not from HIV.
The syndrome itself is a dis-regulation of it. So the worst thing we can think of, HIV being the global pandemic, is what could HIV show us if we chose to turn the lens around? It is the pockets in which we have damaged innate immune system within the human population.
And why is that?
Because these are areas of chronic malnutrition, poor access to food nutrients and good food systems. These are areas of high socio-economic abuses, sex trafficking, child abuse, trauma, all these things dis-regulating the human experience. And we see an over-expression of viruses in this population and we blame it on HIV. That’s the kind of systems re-evaluation we have to do.
So I want to lay all that out to point out that the innate immune system is the whole story.
When we see something go pandemic or endemic within an environment, we can say that something is happening within the innate immune system.
So what is the adaptive immune system with the vaccine story?
We’re giving proteins in an injection that cause an antibody to be formed. That’s the adaptive immune system.
A virus only stays in your bloodstream for three days.
The highest it gets is on the day you’re symptomatic and then it’s immediately diminishing.
In other words, your innate immune system will bring you into balance with that genomic information within three days. Period.
The sickness and the fevers and the recurring symptoms of inflammation that can then happen over the next following weeks are, the viruses are already gone. So what you are actually reacting to is an inability to adapt.
If you’re seeing a clinical syndrome where you’re failing to take this new information in, and you have a chronic inflammatory result that could lead to death, you’re demonstrating that your body decided you need to make an adaptation to survive in the world and your body didn’t have the clinical reserves of antioxidants, clotting cascade factors, all these different things.
And so in your dis-regulated, exhausted, diminished, depleted state, you ended up into a chronic syndrome we would call COVID-19, which of course is not the description of the virus but a syndrome. The virus was gone within 48 hours of the first symptoms.
It takes 3-5 weeks from the time of infection before an antibody shows up. The adaptive immune system shows up 3-5 weeks after the virus already cleared from the bloodstream.
So why do we think the antibody has anything to do with clearing the virus if in fact it’s the innate immune system that clears it? And what the heck are we even measuring with the antibody?
It turns out that the antibody we’re measuring is not even the virus but one of the proteins that is made by the genomic information that’s delivered to you.
So the adaptive immune system is saying, “your innate immune system is off” – it can’t seem to bring itself into balance with the homestasis between protein synthesis and the decision not to, so we better make antibodies to reduce the number of cells that are making this protein.
But the virus is already gone.
This is now genetic information that’s been uploaded into your body and your DNA is now deciding to make a protein that your adaptive immune system is saying you’re over-regulating.
So when we see a study that comes out and it says, “good news, we vaccinated a bunch of people and there was a 94% reduction in the people with symptoms from SARS-COVID-19”, they’re being very specific about that. They’re saying there’s 94% reduction in COVID-19 cases – which is a clinical syndrome again. It’s not the number of infections because if they actually measured the number of infections they’d be identical.
Because the adaptive immune system has nothing to do with your initial absorption of that virus or your reproduction of that virus or its proteins.
We’re going to have the same number of cases of actual presence of the genetic information that we could call it an infection. But it’s the adaptive immune system’s downstream ability to reduce the amount of subsequent – in the weeks following – exposure to that genetic information – in the way in which you produce it.
So what it could do is change your adaptive relationship to protein synthesis of your new gain of function that you’ve had from this genetic update. this new genomic capacity.
So we have the wrong story completely.
It is not attacking the virus. It doesn’t make you attack the virus better or anything else. It just says – “in the event your innate immune system is not functional and you cannot decide at the cellular level which protein you’re going to produce at any moment accurately, then this thing may help as a stop gap down the road.”
That is the only scientific hope we may have in a vaccine: that maybe downstream after a coronavirus infection, it might reduce the amount of people that are over-expressing some proteins that might make them acute inflammatory or chronically inflammatory, or increase the morbidity/mortality from heart attack, stroke, something else.
That needs to be the narrative.
This (vaccine) is not going to protect you from coronavirus. This may reduce your risk from subsequent inflammatory inflammations. That should be the message from the CDC, WHO, NIH. That is what people should say should be the expectation. Anything else they say, it’s lying.
That sounds harsh. But it’s scientifically lying. We have enough data from the last hundred years to know it’s a wrong narrative.
Now interestingly, we have the problems. What we just described is the hope for the vaccine – which is not to prevent infections but to reduce a little bit the inflammatory consequences downstream.
The only place they can find a benefit then is to take individuals who are at high risk for the inflammatory cascade, i.e. Americans, and put them into a study and say, “hey look, we reduced the inflammatory responses to Americans who are seeing this”.
Keep in mind, America has 4% of the entire global population and we reported over 20% of global deaths from this pandemic. So even if those numbers are remotely accurate, we have 5-8x any vulnerability to death than any other nation in the world. And that’s unfortunately probably quite accurate.
We rank 40th in there world for global health outcomes from neonatal death on day one to expected age to cancer. We’re behind every other industrialized nation in health outcomes.
So this pandemic should have shown us, “US, what are you doing? Where’s your innate immune system? What are you doing to your native food environment? To your air? To your water systems and everything else – to so predispose your population to something like this level of morbidity and mortality you’re seeing in the United States.”
And other countries are openly talking about this. African countries are saying, “don’t listen to Americans, they are sick people, none of them are healthy.” So it’s not a secret globally. We don’t have a pandemic. We have a severe deficiency of health in the United States.
[Just because you have an antibody that you got artificially through a vaccine, does not mean you are protected from a disease or virus.]
Vaccines traditionally are gauged by antibody efficacy. When they say a vaccine is 94% effective, it doesn’t mean they have protection against a virus …
COVID-19 is not a virus, it’s a syndrome.
What they’re saying is there’s less inflammatory consequences to seeing this genetic information.
One scary thought is that there are multiple systems now that are dis-regulated because we know that that antibody presence does not stop the virus from coming in; it has changed your relationship to the response not just to the virus but to the proteins that your body will make.
When you make a lot of antibodies to a protein that will be made from this new genetic update, you’re not actually getting the update.
If your body is trying to make the new protein to make a more robust inflammatory response against some toxin in your environment or some ecological threat that has now emerged, like coronavirus has now emerged, as an adapted genetic sequence to make a new protein to adapt away from that toxin, that’s the kind of sequences that are likely occurring around us.
And yet we’re not telling that bigger story. We’re telling this very narrow picture.
I’m concerned that if we put into widespread use this vaccine – which is frightening because it is a very specific type of new experience, we’ve never done a messenger RNA vaccine targeted antibody before.
And we’re now targeting something that is very frighteningly common in our bloodstream. That’s a whole other story there.
The reality around the adaptive immune system function is that you are now blunting whatever update they were having.
And, we now know from the flu vaccine that if we blunt the genetic information from the flu we now have a decreased ability to resist coronaviruses, other respiratory viruses in our environment. We can’t have the same relationship with them so we are more prone to complications from these other things.
So what are we predisposing this generation to?
And the answer is, something we’ve never seen before.
So we are setting ourselves up for a new pandemic in subsequent years as we reach some sort of critical mass of global population that are now vaccinated to have an artificial adaptive immune system experience with coronavirus. We are setting ourselves up for an unseen threat in nature that is now going to be thrown off in its relationship and homeostasis or balance with our future immune systems as a species.
So we are opening up Pandora’s Box here by doing something we’ve never done before at a higher level of intervention than we’ve ever done before in a population and we don’t have a clue what we’re setting ourselves up for just in the infectious disease mindset category.
If we back up a little further and now realize that the microbiome is really critical in the way in which we interact with the virile, very critical to our immune system’s intelligence around autoimmune disease, it gets even more frightening.
The amount of autoimmune disease that we can see come out in the next five years could be devastating.
And we’ve already seen this happen.
Every time we’ve introduced a new vaccine, starting all the way back in the 1950s, every new vaccine has correlated within 3-5 years, a jump in autoimmune diseases in the population in which we’ve vaccinated.
I’m very confident that we’re going to have a a devastating effect on global immunity and its intelligence to who we are.
We’re losing our self-identity as human as our immune system gets more and more activated to our own cells.
So rheumatoid arthritis is the attack on the human joint from the human immune system. Type 1 Diabetes is an attack of the beta islets from the pancreas from the human immune system.
Hashimoto’s hypothyroidism is the human immune system attacking the human thyroid gland.
That’s what we mean by autoimmunity. It is your own immune system attacking you own body.
It’s not surprising that a screw up of the innate immune system by an abnormal stimulus that’s not a viral capsid and all the proteins and all the regulatory steps that would be achieved through the innate immune system.
It’s an artificial change in your adaptive immune system without the intelligence of the innate immune system and now the innate immune system starts to get confused.
Like, what’s this antibody here? Why are we being stimulated with macrophages to knock out all these human cells? Oh maybe that’s not us. If the macrophages think they need to go clean up the thyroid, that must be foreign material. So the innate immune system changes its relationship and opens up the floodgates of the adaptive immune system..
It’s frightening to go mucking with something that is as eloquent and symphonic in its complexity as the innate immune system and its relationship to the adaptive immune system. We are about to do something terrifying. That’s about 3-5 years out.
In the short term, there is a small percentage of people who get these RNA vaccines will create a hyper antigen response which means the next time they see coronavirus they are going to have an exponential increase in risk of morbidity and mortality from seeing that coronavirus.
So I believe we are about to see a significant portion of the population – 5-10% of the vaccinated group.
So, if we roll (the vaccine) out to a million people, you can take 5% of this group and trust that that group is going to have a really high likelihood of dying from coronavirus next year, especially if you’re vaccinating the elderly or people with high co-morbidities.
So we’re going to vaccinate a population and the next year or the next year, we’re going to see the highest deaths from coronavirus in history – because coronaviruses never caused much mortality.
We’re about to achieve the CDC’s projections that this is 30x more deadly than the flu and we’re going to cause it by this hyper-reaction to the RNA strand, this hyper antigen effect that has been long recognized in these RNA vaccines.
This is a known phenomenon. Pharmaceutical companies know it. Regulatory groups like the FDA know it. NIH, CDC, WHO know it. This is an inherent problem to RNA vaccines.
And we are doing this to the population. Especially, to those low socio-economic minority communities. Holy cow. This is really going to be a devastating event here.
This might be the new Holocaust of our generation.
This is going to be meted out through the human immune system for the first time.
This is completely avoidable and the science is sitting in front of us.
And it’s sitting there and I can talk to anyone in the world and the levels of denial that the human mind can put into play make all of my words useless.
And I’m intrigued by that. Initially I was so frustrated but now I’m really interested to see what we do as a population.
There are lots of scientists out there that are banging the drum saying “we are doing the wrong thing”. And yet the population is not confident enough yet by that other counter narrative – even though they’re the only ones presenting any science.
Yet, the NIH is not presenting any science. The CDC is not showing any safety data that would be at all reassuring that this is the right thing to do.
And yet we have health care practitioners lining up to get this, sight unseen, science misunderstood, adaptive immune system proselytizers and profiteers who don’t even know what the innate immune system is – and they are rushing for this thing.
And so, I’m so curious. What does this mean for humanity?
We need this journey. However this journey unfolds, this is the journey we need.
I sit here in a state of grief for humanity and in a state of awe for our gullible nature. The power of collusion within narratives, the power of that fight or flight, fear/guilt paradigm.
I’m curious to see what journey humanity needs in the next year.