In this video, Ricardo Delgado, founder and director of La Quinta Columna, reveals what he and his research partner, Dr. José Luis Sevillano, discovered after submitting a sealed vial of the Pfizer “vaccine” to a lab for analysis.
“We realized that there was a new phenomenon that for a while we tried to deny, although today it’s evident because of the millions of videos on social media, and we have been able to even measure it with devices: teslameters, magnetometers, etc.
I am referring to the magnetic or pseudo-magnetic phenomenon that people acquire after inoculation.
A magnetic phenomenon on the one hand, but also one that turns inoculated people into superconductors and also stores energy that can be measured with a multimeter in certain parts, such as the forehead, for example.
So from there we started to look for what kind of materials or, better said, nanomaterials can cause those kinds of properties inside the body and we came up with some of the candidates. One of them initially was graphene.
Graphene inside the body acquires magnetic properties and is a superconductor. It serves for energy storage and condensation and was a strong candidate.
Without yet having any knowledge of what was inside the vial, we realized that the industry or rather the stock market of the graphene industry had high uptrend peaks just as the COVID-19 vaccination campaign was starting at the beginning of the year, late December and early January. But also, quite curious, during the flu vaccination campaign.
When we have seen the possibilities that graphene has, or rather, that graphene oxide nanoparticles have inside the body when it comes to neuromodulation and when it comes to picking up neuronal electrophysiological effects for brain mapping, we have realized the possibility that graphene is being injected.
Can graphene be injected? Yes. Graphene can be injected.
And, in fact, some scientific papers have already raised the possibility that it could be used as a nanoadjuvant in vaccines. With that hypothesis of suspicion, we did what anyone could have done and what I also recommend that you can do if you have access to a vial.
Graphene Oxide found in the “vaccine”
We had access to a sealed vial from Pfizer, and by means of a request for services to a university, specifically in my name, it was sent for an analysis of the vial, where we were looking for the material in question: graphene.
After some time of investigation by Dr. Pablo Campra Madrid, Doctor in Chemical Sciences, Bachelor in Biological Sciences and member of the University of Almeria, we obtained this preliminary report where we are told that there is indeed solid evidence of graphene oxide in the sample and that it is also the main component of what they wrongly called a vaccine.
From here we began to study the toxicity or cytotoxicity that graphene oxide has on the body.
Pay attention to this finding:
- Graphene oxide inside the body causes thrombogenicity, thrombi.
- Graphene oxide inside the body causes blood clotting.
- Graphene oxide inside the body causes post inflammatory syndrome or systemic or multi-organ inflammations.
- Graphene oxide inside the body when it is above the levels of glutathione —which is the body’s natural reserve of antioxidants—, causes alteration of the immune system, collapse of the immune system and cytokine storm.
- Inhaled graphene oxide spreads evenly throughout the alveolar tract and causes bilateral pneumonias.
- Inhaled graphene oxide causes inflammation of the mucous membranes and thus loss of taste and smell, possible loss of taste and smell: anosmia.
- In short, graphene oxide behaves exactly like the supposed SARS-CoV-2 of the official version, generating the same symptomatology of severe COVID-19.
- When installed at the neuronal level, it causes neurodegeneration or, in other words, neurological COVID-19.
So, from here we started to see what possible compounds, drugs and treatments could degrade graphene oxide.
What can you do if you got the COVID-19 injection?
And look what we found: N-acetylcysteine (NAC) or glutathione administered degrade it. Because what glutathione does is counteract free radicals and oxidants, all the toxins that can enter the body.
And we discovered that there were about 300 clinical studies where certain hospitals and certain universities were using N-acetylcysteine with incredible results.
For example, 100 patients with saturation levels below 50% practically dead —bluntly speaking—, with bilateral pneumonias, within an hour of intravenous glutathione or N-acetylcysteine administration they made it.
They were taken off ventilators and everything. We now fully understand why those treatments worked: because they addressed all the symptoms of the disease supposedly caused by SARS-CoV-2.
Given that to date there is no scientific evidence of an actual sequencing and isolation of SARS-CoV-2, we suspect with many credible indications that COVID-19 disease is actually the side effect of the introduction of graphene oxide into the body by different ways.
Graphene oxide is also found in MASKS, TEST SWABS, HYDROGELS AND CHEM TRAILS
And I say ‘different ways’ because, although they were withdrawn at the time, masks containing graphene oxide nanoparticles have been introduced and are still being marketed.
These masks have been introduced and are still being marketed by companies such as Nanografi, so we have masks with graphene oxide, but also graphene oxide nanoparticles introduced in PCR tests; graphene oxide is also present in antigen tests; hydrogels also contain graphene oxide nanoparticles; intranasal vaccines also, since graphene oxide in aerosols is more potent, as is the supposed SARS-CoV-2.
Intranasal vaccines are also prepared, for example, by Turkey. They are made by Nanografi for COVID-19 and influenza.
We know that, naturally, graphene oxide is eliminated by the levels of glutathione in the body, and that is why we suspect that they propose a second, third and even fourth dose every so often: so that you have your considerable dose of graphene oxide.
In short, we are talking about the simultaneous and gradual mass poisoning of the entire world population.
That is why treatments with glutathione have worked, and that is why treatments with N-acetylcysteine, which is a precursor of glutathione. Because they work providing the army with antioxidant reserves to deal with a toxic substance, a poisoning, that has been introduced into the body by different ways.
‘In a companion study published in Nanoscale, it was shown that GO is degraded in NETs (aka neutrophil extracellular traps, much like bacteria and other pathogens.’ (NETs are released by neutrophils, the most common type of white blood cell specialized in combating infections.)
Taken together, these studies show that GO can be trapped and degraded in NETs just like pathogens.
I want to tell you that we have published in our website at least 70 studies that reflect everything we are saying and manifesting here.
Chlorine Dioxide is also beneficial
On the other hand, I have been asked about the efficacy of chlorine dioxide. That goes another way.
What it does is to oxygenate the cell, it prepares it so that it is not easily destroyed by this toxicant.
What glutathione would do is to provide the army with more numbers of soldiers in terms of glutathione to deal with toxins.
What we have found, as I say, is that most of the treatments that have been with N-acetylcysteine or glutathione and even with other antioxidants such as astaxanthin, which is a powerful antioxidant, have been very favorable treatments for the patients.
FDA seeks to ban NAC even though it helps protect against spike proteins in Covid injections? Why?
And also, curiously and suspiciously, found that these health institutions are literally governed by evil; it is a psychopathy without previous history: we had never seen the history of such psychopathy.
By June 17 that the FDA tried to stop the marketing of N-acetylcysteine after it had been used for 57 years as a normal and ordinary mococcolytic. It was a very suspicious thing to do, wasn’t it?
So this is basically my exposition.
Any doubts that you may have about the studies that we have carried out at La Quinta Columna, well, there is simply something that is very conclusive, and that is the preliminary report of a renowned professor of a public university here in Spain.
We are very close to providing complementary evidence to give more strength to this report in which we are already told that there is solid and proven evidence that there is graphene oxide in the sample that we sent.
Simply, for Colonel Tamayo and Judge Giorgianni: regardless of the fact that we obviously think that SARS-CoV-2 is precisely graphene oxide —and we can prove it— or at least it behaves exactly and exhaustively the same, how is it possible that graphene oxide is injected through the vials?
How is it possible if the masks were really withdrawn because they caused pulmonary affections due to toxicity? What are we talking about, gentlemen?
Here I have tried to make the exposition as synthesized as possible so any doubt that may be generated by the manifestation that I have given here can be clarified throughout the time left we have.”—Ricardo Delgado